GW Police Department site logo

GW Police Department

 

Enhancing Public Safety

Updated September 2024

In 2023, the university began a multi-phase process to arm GWPD supervisors, starting with two supervisory officers. The university proceeded to the final phase in September 2024 by arming all supervisory officers who met rigorous training and certification requirements.

This website contains information about the arming process, including the current status, background, implementation framework, and a feedback form for continued community engagement.

 

PHASE 3

As of September 2024

22
SUPERVISORY
OFFICERS ARMED

(When all vacancies are filled)

Background

The safety and security of our students, faculty, and staff remains a critical priority. Arming is an important part of a comprehensive public safety plan in part because of rising gun violence nationally and the need for GW supervisory officers—who are most familiar with GW’s campuses, community and culture—to respond to life-threatening emergencies. This is particularly crucial in the university’s densely populated setting and during incidents when response time is critical.

In April 2023, the university announced that it would begin planning to arm GWPD supervisors.  After incorporating input from GW community members, in August 2023 the university completed the first phase of the implementation process by arming two executive supervisory officers, while continuing to seek feedback on the process and other enhancements to public safety. The university then moved to phase two in February 2024 and completed implementation with phase three by September 2024.

Share Your Feedback

Please provide feedback related to the GWPD arming process via the form below.

CAPTCHA

Community Conversations on Arming

Staff Conversation

On Sept. 13, 2023, Chief Tate participated in a conversation with Sabrina Minor, vice president and chief people officer, and answered questions from staff about the arming implementation plan.

Student Conversation

On Sept. 15, 2023, Chief Tate participated in a conversation with Colette Coleman, vice provost for student affairs and dean of students, and answered students' questions about arming supervisory officers.

Recent Updates

 

Frequently Asked Questions 

What was the implementation planning framework the university used?

The below  planning framework and related resources were shared with the community as the arming process began and throughout its implementation:

Updated Implementation Planning Framework

1: Arming Scope and Strategy
The full implementation plan envisions arming GWPD’s supervisors only. The plan will begin at the start of the 2023 academic year with the initial arming of two executive supervisors. Subsequently, additional supervisors will be armed in phases as requirements are met and community input is incorporated. 

2: Use of Force Policy Review and Revisions
A new Use of Force Policy was created and emphasizes the sanctity of life, de-escalation requirement, gradations of force and explicit restrictions on use of deadly force.

3: Training Requirements
Armed supervisors will be required to be trained regularly on de-escalation, implicit bias, mental health response, firearms qualification and the virtual reality training simulator. Additionally, armed supervisors will undergo new background investigations and psychological evaluations. The pre-arming period for newly hired supervisors will provide campus cultural fluency.

4: Independent Review Committee
An Independent Review Committee will be created to provide additional review and accountability with respect to the arming of qualified supervisory GWPD officers.  The committee will be composed of faculty, staff, and students, and chaired by a member of the faculty.  The committee will be charged with:

  • Reviewing any GWPD supervisory officer’s use of force involving a firearm while on duty. “Use of force involving a firearm” includes any use of a firearm, including unholstering.
  • Producing a publicly available annual report summarizing the committee’s work and including any recommendations it may have for GWPD policy or procedure changes.

The committee will be independent of GWPD and will not replace GWPD’s internal review and disciplinary procedures.

5: Continued Community Engagement

  • GWPD will continue community engagement and outreach efforts as means to build trust and open lines of communication with the GW community.
  • A new Campus Safety Advisory Committee will be launched.  This committee will include students, faculty, staff, and community members and will meet regularly to increase engagement on safety concerns.

Additional Public Safety Planning Enhancements
Initiatives are underway to enhance and continue to improve GW’s comprehensive public safety approach. These include:

  • Response to Mental Health Concerns: Continued evaluation of how police interact with people in crisis and enhance protocols to align with best practices.
  • Building Security: Regular review of access to campus buildings and recommendations on changes based on safety and security considerations.
  • Active Shooter Response Training: Review of opportunities to train community on lockdowns, use of security technology available in classrooms and buildings, and response to active shooter situations.
  • Emergency Notifications System: Regular review and testing of comprehensive emergency notifications systems.

Additional Details and Resources

What has the university done in recent years to improve safety at GW?

The university has equipped buildings, residential units, and classrooms with electronic access, allowing us to quickly and efficiently secure building doors remotely through a single platform. Faculty are able to secure classroom doors electronically while simultaneously signaling for police response via emergency lockdown buttons within classrooms. Our new emergency notification system allows dispatchers to activate alerts nearly immediately from a single platform in the event of a life-threatening emergency. We also have completed other safety enhancements over the past few years, such as upgrading and adding security cameras and creating active shooter protocols and trainings.

GW Police Chief James Tate has prioritized accountability, transparency, and trust. He has taken steps to increase communication and community engagement, particularly with students; improve officer training, including introduction of de-escalation and implicit bias training; improve the response to mental health concerns; and implement the use of body-worn cameras.

Why did the university make the decision to arm supervisory officers?

The university made this decision in part due to the concerning rise in gun violence nationally, alignment with best practices in campus safety, and location and response time.

In recent years there have been too many tragic instances of mass gun violence in communities and on college campuses. In the past several months alone, we have noted with deep concern shooting incidents at educational institutions, including at Michigan State University, the University of Virginia, and an elementary school in Nashville. According to the Gun Violence Archive, as of August 2023 there have been more than 400 mass shootings this year. Immediacy of response to such events is critical, but whenever weapons are involved, unarmed officers cannot respond and must rely instead on the response of other armed law enforcement.

The Board of Trustees and university leadership also recognized the need for arming given the university’s densely populated setting and importance of having individuals involved in incident response who are familiar with and directly connected to our community. Our supervisory officers, who are stationed on campus and know its geography and logistics best, are a very important part of emergency response, especially during times of increased calls for service requiring the attention of our local partner agencies elsewhere in the District. When weapons are involved, minutes matter.

How many supervisory officers were armed in each phase of the process?

The university's arming implementation plan was a multi-phase process. In phase 1, two executive supervisory officers were armed. In phase 2, five supervisory officers were armed. Over the course of phase 3, corporals and sergeants were armed. When all current vacancies are filled for these roles, a total of 22 supervisors will be armed. Supervisory officers are only armed after meeting the rigorous training and certification requirements outlined in the implementation plan.

Who are the members of the interim Independent Review Committee?

The interim IRC members are:

  • Elizabeth Bouseman, Graduate Student
  • Mitchell Foster, Staff
  • Lionel Howard, Faculty, Graduate School of Education and Human Development
  • John Philbeck, Faculty, Columbian College of Arts and Sciences
  • Kimberly Shaw, Staff
  • Salmoncain Smith-Shomade, Undergraduate Student
  • Amita Vyas, Faculty, Milken Institute School of Public Health (Chair)
How can I provide my feedback?

Please provide your feedback via the form above.